Proof that Jews have always controlled at least 85% of the U.S. media. : Houston Indymedia

As of January 2003 the U.S. media was virtually 100% controlled by Jews, who make up only 2.5% of the U.S. population. But now, it is only 85.7% controlled by Jews, as Richard Parsons replaced Gerald Levin as CEO at AOL Time Warner in January.
1) ABC News, Disney CEO Michael Eisner, Jew
2) NBC, MS-NBC, and CNBC is controlled by CEO Neal Shapiro, Jew. NBC Reporter Andrea Mitchell, Jew, is the wife of Alan Greenspan, but she keeps her last name hidden so people won’t know this. “Dateline NBC” Executive Producer is currently Jew Marc Rosenwasser.
3) CBS along with 180 U.S. radio stations is controlled by Jew Murray Rothstein, who changed his name to Sumner Redstone, who is CEO of Viacom.
4) Fox News Corporation CEO: Jew Peter Chernin, who replaced Rupert Murdoch as CEO in 2002.
5) The New York Times Co./Boston Globe: Owned by Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, his two lead columnists are Thomas Friedman and William Safire, all three of whom are partisan Jews who stridently support U.S. troops sent to war to die for Israel. None of them served in the military.
6) The Washington Post: Partially owned by Jew Lally Weymouth, a close associate of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and daughter of late Katherine Meyer Graham, all of whom are Jews. And of course the Washington Post editorials reflect a stridently pro-Israel and anti-Arab viewpoint, typified by nationally syndicated columnist Richard Cohen, one of the newspaper’s primary Israel-first propagandists with a national reach.
7) Until January 2003 even AOL Time-Warner/CNN had Jew Gerald Levin as CEO, until he was replaced by Hawaiian-African-American Richard D. Parsons.
8) Here’s a list of the American Radio talk show hosts who have been put on the airwaves, all of whom have been screened to be rabidly pro-Israel and pro-war, and none of whom ever served in the U.S. military: Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Mike Gallagher, Michael Medved, Dennis Prager, Art Bell, G. Gordon Liddy, and in New York City, Bob Grant & Jay Diamond.
Since CBS was started by William Paley in 1928, NBC by David Sarnoff in 1928, and ABC by Leonard Goldenson in 1968, all of whom were Jews, the Jews have dominated the media ever since it came into existence 75 years ago. They usually use Gentile on-air anchors to give the appearance that the media is not controlled by Jews. This is typical Jewish deception.
99% of the Jews who currently control the media, and are war hawks on Arab countries, never served in the military (chickenhawks).

Hmmm. Choke a little. ... Huh? Is it for real?

Ok, now that I've recovered, a little anyway, I'll say that your information is impressive and at least somewhat shocking; particularly with all that's gone and going on.

I guess that it explains, at least to some extent, why US media was heavily or massively flooded with proganada, lies, deceit, government coverups or help towards that, (biased) distortions of reality, ....

Before, I had heard or read that there was considerable influence of that nature; however, your breakdown or list definitely is appreciable and appreciated.

You really must read my autobiography WILL

p56-70 and 79-80 cover my service in the Army.

The rest of your info is equally unreliable.

William Shatner, half-Jew

What a specious endeavor you've undertaken.

Unless any CEO mentioned happens to hold the controlling
interest in any respective media enterprise - that CEO would not 'control' anything.

Example; you omit to mention that NBC is owned by General Electric; care to guess the religions of the major stockholders, or it's Board of Directors (or; 'the owners')?

You've left out the Wall Street Journal (owned by Dow Jone's major stockholders - care to guess if a particular family controls the majority of shares, and their religion, if any)? And you've neglected to mention Ted Turner and his religion, as well as Sun Yung Moon (The Washington Times) and his religion, oh, and you forgot Rupert Murdock (NY Post) and his religion - and - oops - Bill Gates....shall I continue?

BAD PEOPLE don't adhere to any religion except power.

Power isn't necessarily a bad thing.

What is a (very) bad thing is singling out one religion and skewing and omitting pertinent facts about all our major media outlets in order to put forward one's own (in this instance, severely flawed) case.

I meant to say "powder" not power. Powder makes one sneeze if one inhales too much. Plus everyone knows powderful forces are trying to take over the world.

I guess it's all a matter of vocabulary.

It's nice to see how accepting and tolerant you can be of other cultures, races and religions.

This is just another example of blind hatred.

I really love how all the 'progressives' have come out so strong against such speech. NOT!!!

It's so funny how the left is so outspoken about redistricting: "This is just hateful people trying to screw minorities" "Republicans are evil" "Rick Perry should die."

Then you have some guy saying something that would fit in and be applauded at any Nazi ralley, and what do you get? Where is the outrage here?

Oh, that's right, it doesn't fit your political agenda. My bad.

Richard, aim higher. It is impossible to make a legitimate causal claim to the associations you have made about jews in the media. I just don't buy it. There is a disproportionate group of finns who are in the cellphone business. I am half finnish but don't worry, I don't own even one Nokia (no it is not japanese). Shouldn't we be worried? Everybody holds those things so tight against their faces, you know.
There are people from all walks of life with all kinds of ideas. Rancid makes the same kind of associations about progressives. No way to prove cause there either. I don't buy it.
It is more worthwhile to investigate, and mimic, the "1%" who set up situations in which a large allotments of power can be exchanged by other select, slightly larger, unidentifiable, groups of people. One or two get huge portions by enabling others to get relatively smaller portions that are still generous in absolute terms. Whatever the "product"*, the groups change with each power grab but never grow beyond a small population. You might call them a series of "sweet deals."
They are generative rather than reactionary in nature.
None of the respondents to this article are probably in that group so we should all stand together in front of a convenience store, have non-alcoholic beers, and sing Neil Diamond songs.
Besides reacting to articles on the web, progressives are setting up their own generative allotments of power which attract growing numbers of people. In fact, the "product", to use the language of aforementioned group, is just that, people. Its a generative, non-reactionary, populist, sweet deal. It is by no means perfect but I enjoy participating in it.
Aim High.

*The invasion of Iraq was referred to as "product" by the Secretary of Commerce, a former lobbyist for General Motors.

"Republicans are evil"

So many Americans (military/civilian) are dead now because of the Jewish people. Jews controlled U.S. media, a big part of finance but fortunately not the UN, not yet. My suggestion is until media Jewish tycoons being replace by non Jewish folks, there will not be any peace in the Middle East. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031016/ap_on_re_as/islamic_summit

There are also alot of us Jews in independent media and otherwise fighting our war machine and Israel's. It's not a question of replacing Jews with non_jews (sounds a wee bit fascist, doesn't it?) it's a question of changing, challenging, denouncing or disregarding the entire corporate media structure.

I'm sorry, I'm a bit confused. See, here's the thing: The media isn't "owned by Jews." Ted Turner (notta jew) owned/started/ran CNN. He's not a jew. Rupert Murdoch last I checked was NOT a Jew. Clear Channel? Not owned by Jews, nor is it run by Jews. Knight-Ridder Media? Uhm, that's owned by Dan Quayle's family. They're NOT JEWS.
It is idiocy of the highest order to suggest the media is controlled by Jews. The FACT of the matter is that bigoted "Christians" wouldn't let the jews of this country into the true arena's of power. They don't mind the appearance of Jews running the companies, though. It suits their desire for anonymity and division among the populace. A united populace is the greatest fear of the Oligarchy which runs America. You will always be a peasant enslaved in chains until you rid yourself of your prejudices and bigotry and paranoid right wing pseudo "Christian" conspiracies.

Hi Suddam and im a jew

Don't throw "Christians" into this anti-semtic bs. They may call themselves "Christian", but that is a lie to help them with their message of hate. Calling this a "Christian conspiracy" drops you down to their level. Think about it, Jesus Christ was a Jew, so why would a Christian hate or disparage Jews?

Who owns Nokia? I'm going to by Nokia N-gage, but if its owned by jews then i'm not going to buy it.

Nokia is Finnish.

Israel does it 's best to hide the origin of it's products.
Because Sharon is seen as he is, a terrorist. I personally will buy nothing knowingly from Israel.

100,000 Jews came out to honor Rabin and call for peace, yet the terrorists running their country just like the terrorists running the US, continues to attack and hide the truth.

Sharon is a Zionist terrorist and Bush is a Christian terrorist.
They must be stood up too at every turn.

http://www.gushshalom.com

say hello to grace for me

Thanks BraveNewWorldOrderFighter! What you have uploaded there is an arabic word for God being defecated upon by a dog.In other words, the Arab Christians also writes God's name the same way. That word simply means GOD. It's the same GOD for us Christians.
Congratulations!! You have offended not only the Muslims but also us Christians. If you are a Jew,it goes to prove what we've been thinking you people all along.

Ted Turner eventually sold out to Time Warner.
Good article below shows how he was blocked by Jews from buying CBS.

http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/

The only problem I have with this article is that it fails to mention that Murdoch is a prominent Zionist and that his mother was Jewish.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/05/Murdoch2.html

Nor does it mention that is meteoric rise to power was initially financed by Oppenheimer and Bronfman.
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHil...75/newshist.htm

Finally, an explanation of all the worlds ills. I guess someone forgot to tell the Jews as the majority still support the Democrats and class themselves as liberals and socialists. Try again.

If this is a joke then it is a miserable failure, if it's for real then it's a pile of anti-semitic crap; the sort of thing that, in the UK, would turn up on the website of the British National Party - fascists to you.

Noonday shows danger walks among us
by Jeorge Zarazua
11 Jan 2004

Krar and Bruey were selling firearms, ammunition and anti-Semitic, anti-black and anti-government books and pamphlets to right-wing extremists. Since their arrest, Krar has pleaded guilty to possession of a chemical weapon, and Bruey has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess illegal weapons....

SEE: http://news.mysanantonio.com/story.cfm?xla=saen&xlb=180&xlc=1112145

And we periodically poison wells, snatch the bodies of christian children and make unleavened bread with their blood.

Is Richard Lee a nickname for Osama Bin Laden, Yasser Arafat or who?
If it is a real person, than he needs psychiatric help... or a history lesson.

vergogna! propaganda nazista... ho ribrezzo e terrore... accendete la luce! enlightment, please, towards these dark minds!!!

It says under 'editorial policy' for indymedia:

"Very rarely, someone abuses our trust by posting a story that is way outside what the website is set up to do, and we may remove it."

I suppose then that this bigoted rant is compatible with this website's ideas. So what kind of new world is this 'Independent Media' trying to build?

<<My suggestion is until media Jewish tycoons being replace by non Jewish folks, there will not be any peace in the Middle East. >>
yes, of course, 'cause that's why Arabs blow themselves and little Israeli children up--they are unhappy about Alan Greenspan's wife's religion.
Nothing at all to do with their culture...

<<Mr
by ALi, Hassan Akbur, Saaladin Tuesday November 04, 2003 at 06:58 AM
Who owns Nokia? I'm going to by Nokia N-gage, but if its owned by jews then i'm not going to buy it.>>

No indeedy Hassan, you'd be far better served with a cell phone designed and produced in an Arab country. 'Course, you may have to wait a few decades....

To give you a better idea of when they will produce cell phones, first wait for them to start using toilet paper and then add 120 years to that.

WorkingForChange.com
January 7, 2004

Writing in Salon.com about the prosecution of Clayton Waagner, the Army of God foot-soldier who "mailed hundreds of envelopes stuffed with white powder and threatening letters to abortion clinics and reproductive rights organizations" shortly after Sept. 11, veteran investigator Frederick Clarkson observed that the two-week trial was "remarkable, not so much for its verdict as for the near-complete lack of media attention that it attracted."

Waagner was charged with more than 50 federal counts, including threatening to use weapons of mass destruction. "[However], in a news culture obsessed with Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein and overseas terror threats, few reporters were there for the denouement."

The lack of widespread coverage of the Waagner trial has been the rule rather than the exception when homegrown terrorists are involved. One journalist who has closely followed all these developments is Daniel Levitas, author of The Terrorist Next Door: The Militia Movement and the Radical Right (Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Press, Nov. 2002, 520 pp. $16.95 paper, $27.95 cloth), soon to released in paperback.....

If Bush, Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft really wanted to win this "War on Terror," the Neo-Nazis would be sitting in chain-link cells in Guantanamo.

Mono means "one".

Don't you mean "the 8 OCTO-lithic media corporations," jackass?

The fact is, Indymedia (or NaziMedia as it's commonly known) is run by the Jews.
NaziMedia's anti-Jew stance is the perfect smoke screen.

Nothing wrong with zionist products.
I bought a tool box made in Israel. Liked it so much I bought a second one. They're not bomb proof but pretty rugged just the same. Only problem is that being so popular you tend to see several of them on the one site at any given time. So you need some way to identify which one is yours.
I call mine mine "Rupert" and "Christian". You get the idea.

There will always be bigots. It's one of the sadder lessons a person learns as he goes through life.

When I was small, my dad used to say a lot of old people were going to have to die off to eliminate racial prejudice. So I figured at the worst, in 20-25 years, bigotry would be gone and peace and justice would prevail.

Dad was wrong -- not that valiant efforts and sacrifices haven't been made to eliminate America's deadliest cancer.

Old people pass their bigotry to their young, and little angels in their cribs begin to sprout horns as they work toward a cultural vocabulary that will assure the continuation of the disease.

Martin Luther King Jr. was in my mind the greatest living American. Some people gag when I say that. Fine, let 'em gag.
I know he wasn't perfect. Neither is Rush Limbaugh or Jimmy Swaggart or Bill Clinton or W.

Bigotry is a pretty strong emotion. It enables a person to lie himself to a superior position.

If it's not skin bigotry, it's sex bigotry, and if it's not sex bigotry, it's national bigotry. A lot of people just aren't going to give up their prejudices, no matter how many lives are lost . . .

Hey buddy... seeing as you hate Jews so much, what are you going to do when Jesus TheJew (and all his Jewish pals) come back ? 'Cos then the Jews really will run the world!!
Boy, will your day suck, big time, then!

May the Lord bless you and keep you.... far away from us!

- Jesus-lovin' Jewboy

this thread is the best evidence that 'anti-zionism' and nazism are the same shit but different assholes

I’m a strong believer that Americans are in the dark about everything that’s going on in Washington and the white house and because of this they are sending their kids to fight someone else’s war for the wrong reasons. At first the war was all about Osama and his crew then somehow it shifted to saving the world (getting rid of bad apples) and Saddam got the first boot, but what I don't understand is why start in Iraq when clearly 15 of the people who crash the planes (that was the first reason to begin the war) were from Saudi Arabia. Don’t make any sense to me to blame Saddam for WMD and leave Saudi alone let alone bring the King to the Bush ranch like giving him a price for what his people did. We need more people like you guys that are not controlled by any organization with religious principles of any kind, news and information should be fair and square not propaganda or right handed only, how can we call America free when we don’t know half the truth of anything that’s going on.

if there is any racist stuff on here, please notify the editors (by sending the exact URL or article / comment #) at houston@indymedia.org anti-Jew stuff and anti-Arab stuff violates our guidelines, but anti Israeli war machine stuff or anti suicide bomber stuff is welcome

we're not great about hiding comments in general (so help us!), but we usually catch the racist articles